IMAGE PROCESSING GALLERY
One of the biggest challenges for Juno is Jupiter's intense radiation belts, which are expected to limit the lifetime of both Juno’s engineering and science subsystems. JunoCam is now showing the effects of that radiation on some of its parts. PJ56 images show a reduction in our dynamic range and an increase in background and noise. We invite citizen scientists to explore new ways to process these images to continue to bring out the beauty and mysteries of Jupiter and its moons.
For those of you who have contributed – thank you! Your labors of love have illustrated articles about Juno, Jupiter and JunoCam. Your products show up in all sorts of places. We have used them to report to the scientific community. We are writing papers for scientific journals and using your contributions – always with appropriate attribution of course. Some creations are works of art and we are working out ways to showcase them as art.
We have a methane filter, included for the polar science investigation, that is almost at the limits of our detector’s wavelength range. To get enough photons for an image we need to use a very long exposure. In some images this results in scattered light in the image. For science purposes we will simply crop out the portions of the image that include this artifact. Work is in progress to determine exactly what conditions cause stray light problems so that this can be minimized for future imaging.
The JunoCam images are identified by a small spacecraft icon. You will see both raw and processed versions of the images as they become available. The JunoCam movie posts have too many images to post individually, so we are making them available for download in batches as zip files.
You can filter the gallery by many different characteristics, including by Perijove Pass, Points of Interest and Mission Phase. If you have a favorite “artist” you can create your own gallery. Click on “Submitted by” on the left, select your favorite artist(s), and then click on “Filter”.
A special note about the Earth Flyby mission phase images: these were acquired in 2013 when Juno flew past Earth. Examples of processed images are shown; most contributions are from amateurs.
The spacecraft spin rate would cause more than a pixel's worth of image blurring for exposures longer than about 3.2 milliseconds. For the illumination conditions at Jupiter such short exposures would result in unacceptably low SNR, so the camera provides Time-Delayed-Integration (TDI). TDI vertically shifts the image one row each 3.2 milliseconds over the course of the exposure, cancelling the scene motion induced by rotation. Up to about 100 TDI steps can be used for the orbital timing case while still maintaining the needed frame rate for frame-to-frame overlap. For Earth Flyby the light levels are high enough that TDI is not needed except for the methane band and for nightside imaging.
Junocam pixels are 12 bits deep from the camera but are converted to 8 bits inside the instrument using a lossless "companding" table, a process similar to gamma correction, to reduce their size. All Junocam products on the missionjuno website are in this 8-bit form as received on Earth. Scientific users interested in radiometric analysis should use the "RDR" data products archived with the Planetary Data System, which have been converted back to a linear 12-bit scale.
Hazes and shadows on two planets
The heavily processed JunoCam image at left shows long bands of haze in Jupiter's northern hemisphere. It was obtained during the PJ25 flyby on February 17, 2020. The haze appears slightly bluish and casts brownish shadows on the cloud deck below.
The image at right was obtained by Landsat 8 on May 9, 2021 and might be of peripheral interest when looking at hazes in the JunoCam images. It is processed from bands 4, 3 and 2 (red/green/blue) and includes the site of the ongoing Geldingadalir volcanic eruption in Iceland. The volcanic plume containing sulphur dioxide (SO2) among other things is clearly visible; clouds and hazes associated with it extend to the west (or WSW). What this has in common with the image of Jupiter is that the plume and associated haze also appears slightly bluish and casts brownish shadows (this can be verified by looking at earlier images; the shadows are real features, there are no dark and/or brownish areas where the shadows are located). This image is slightly enhanced to better show the plume and the shadows and the color saturation was also increased. The JunoCam image is more heavily processed.
This comparison between JunoCam and Landsat images was inspired by a Facebook post from the Volcanology and Natural Hazard Group at the University of Iceland which posted a different version of this Landsat image (different bands were used) and mentioned the bluish haze and yellowish/brownish shadows from the plume. This particular Facebook post is here:
https://www.facebook.com/Natturuva/posts/2901017770112311